CAT Previous Year Solved Question Papers 2003

CAT Previous Year Solved Question Papers  2003
60% Off

CAT Previous Year Solved Question Papers 2003

1114 Views
Publisher: Faculty Notes
Author:
Availability: In Stock
INR 10.00 INR 4.00 ( 60% Off )
Effective Price after using Coupon Code: SAVE20
Download & Read Books Offline (Desktop/Laptop/Android Device) :
Customers who Bought this Ebook also Bought
  • Snapshot
  • Description

About this eBook

it has successfully added an extra gene to potatoes to enhance the protein content of the tuber by at least 30 percent. It is quite likely that the GM controversy will soon hit the headlines in India since a spokesperson of the Indian Central government has recently announced that the government may use the protato in its midday meal programme for schools as early as next year.
CAT PAPER 2003 Leaked
Page 5
Why should scientific progress , with huge potential benefits to the poor and malnourished, be so controversial The anti-GM lobby contends that pernicious propaganda has vastly exaggerated the benefits of GM and completely evaded the costs which will have to be incurred if the genetically-modified food industry is allowed to grow unchecked. In particular, they allude to different types of costs. This group contends that the most important potential cost is that the widespread distribution and growth of genetically-modified food will enable the corporate world alias the multinational corporations MNCs to completely capture the food chain. A small group of biotech companies will patent the transferred genes as well as the technology associated with them. They will then buy up the competing seed merchants and seed-breeding centers, thereby controlling the production of food at every possible level. Independent farmers, big and small, will be completely wiped out of the food industry. At best, they will be reduced to the status of being subcontractors. This line of argument goes on to claim that the control of the food chain will be disastrous for the poor since the MNCs, guided by the profit motive, will only focus on the high-value food items demanded by the affluent. Thus, in the long run, the production of basic staples which constitute the food basket of the poor will taper off. However, this vastly overestimates the power of the MNCs. Even if the research promoted by them does focus on the high-value food items, much of biotechnology research is also funded by governments in both developing and developed countries. Indeed, the protato is a by-product of this type of research. If the protato passes the field trials, there is no reason to believe that it cannot be marketed in the global potato market. And this type of success story can be repeated with other basic food items. The second type of cost associated with the genetically modified food industry is environmental damage. The most common type of genetic engineering involved gene modification in plants designed to make them resistant to applications of weed-killers. This then enables farmers to use massive dosages of weedkillers so as to destroy or wipe out all competing varieties of plants in their field. However, some weeds through genetically-modified pollen contamination may acquire resistance to a variety of weed-killers. The only way to destroy these weeds is through the use of ever-stronger herbicides which are poisonous and linger on in the environment. 11.
The author doubts the anti-GM lobby s contention that MNC control of the food chain will be disastrous for the poor because 1. MNCs will focus on high-value food items. 2. MNCs are driven by the motive of profit maximization. 3. MNCs are not the only group of actors in genetically-modified food research. 4. Economic development will help the poor buy MNC-produced food.
12.
Using the clues in the passage, which of the following countries would you expect to be in the forefront of the anti-GM campaign 1. USA and Spain. 2. India and Iraq. 3. Germany and France. 4. Australia and New Zealand.